WARNING: Caution regarding property purchases in the occupied area of CYPRUS

 

 

Make Home page


Main Page
 

Enclaved Person

Cyprus Problem - Enclaved

The Third Vienna Agreement

Resolution 1333 (2003) [1

High School (Gymnasium)

Murders

Destruction of our Cultural Heritage

Pictures from yester days

Photos 1

Photos 2

The pepper dance

Associations

Rizokarpaso Beaches

Rizokarpaso place-names

Enclaved Messages

Other Occupied Areas
 

 

Renewed: 7/1/2007

 

See reference to the Eastern
Mediterranean University in the official web site of
the US Embassy in Nicosia.
http://www.americanembassy.org.cy/AmericanCorners/index.htm
 

    5th January 2007

 

His Excellency Robert Holmes Tuttle                                                                                  

US Ambassador to the Court of St James's

24 Grosvenor Square

London W1A 1AE

 

 

Dear Mr Holmes Tuttle


The Executive Committee and members of our Association are appalled at the discovery that the official web site of the US Embassy Nicosia contains "American Corner Famagusta" (Eastern Mediterranean University).

 

Surely this item, on an official US website, is giving credence and confidence to the illegal regime in occupied north Cyprus since the US seems to be condoning the invasion, occupation and colonization of the small island of Cyprus and by so doing is hindering progress and the fair and just solution to the complex problems in Cyprus.  Recognising and promoting the so called "Eastern Mediterranean University" on the Nicosia US Embassy official web site is very offensive to our members and other British citizens of Greek Cypriot descent who have been denied access to their properties in occupied north Cyprus and whose friends and relatives were killed or are missing or have been enclaved for the last 32 years in Rizokarpasso.   Rizokarpasso was a totally Greek Cypriot village of over 3,000 people prior to the Turkish invasion;  through the policy of ethnic cleansing and denial of human rights the 3,000 have been reduced to 265 (the elderly mother of one of our members died over the Christmas period in Rizokarpasso) .

 

The only fair, just and long term solution is the withdrawal of the occupying Turkish troops and illegal settlers and the return of the legal owners to their homes and properties in north Cyprus.    The  denial of US support for the illegal regime and the reunification of the Republic of Cyprus is not only a morally correct stand for the US to take but it is one that is in our long term interest in order to preserve our democratic way of life.


The members of our Association hope that an ethical foreign policy based on democratic principles and human rights will be followed by America and Britain in future Cyprus settlement plans and that official websites are not used to promote illegal
organisations occupying land that does not belong to them and functioning under an illegal regime.  We trust that the "American Corner Famagusta" will be removed from the US Embassy website in Cyprus.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Mrs Mary Helen Karaolis  BEd(Hons)   MA  NPQH

President of the Association of Rizokarpasso in Britain on behalf of the Executive Committee & Members

_______________________________________________________________________________________________

Association of Rizokarpasso in Britain at a British Foreign & Commonwealth Office Meeting

A delegation from the Association of Rizokarpasso in Britain consisting of Mary Karaolis (President), and Executive Committee Members Yiannoulla Antoniades and Maria Panteli had a meeting to, once again, put forward the   views of the overseas Rizokarpassides who are first and subsequent generation British Citizens.  They visited the British Foreign & Commonwealth Office and had a long, frank and open discussion with Simon Horner, Team Leader, Cyprus and Greece Team Enlargement & SE Europe Group, Europe Directorate General and Madeline Knox, Cyprus Desk Officer. 

The Association of Rizokarpasso delegation at the meeting, which lasted well over an hour, focussed the discussion on:

·   The fact that Rizokarpasso was a totally Greek Cypriot village with a population of over 3,000 prior to the Turkish invasion, now reduced to 276 enclaved Greek Cypriots surrounded by settlers from Turkey who occupy the homes and properties of Greek Cypriots.

·   The plight of the enclaved in Rizokarpasso, their reduced numbers, lack of freedom of movement and other basic human rights, intimidation, continuous surveillance, harassment   and murders.

·   The violation of the freedom of religion for the enclaved, who are restricted in exercising their religion.   The breaking of the crosses in the cemetery and desecration of the graves.

·   The failure of the British Government to fulfil its obligation as a Guarantor Power for the independence and territorial integrity of the Republic of Cyprus.

·    The interference of the smooth running of the schools in Rizokarpasso and the long and laborious process for teachers to be "approved" by the illegal regime;   currently an Art teacher is still waiting to be "approved" for the gymnasion.

·   The right of the refugees and overseas Cypriots to return to their homes and properties.   The right of the refugees and overseas Cypriots to compensation for the loss of use and enjoyment of their properties since 1974.

·   The demand for the basic human right to return to our property will not disappear with the natural passage of time and changes in population.   Modern technology has ensured that there are accurate records of events and property ownership. This information is available for second, third and subsequent generations of Rizokarpasides.

·   Advertisements and feature articles in popular newspapers e.g. Sunday Mirror, Sunday Times, Daily Mail etc for holidays and properties in occupied northern Cyprus are a disgrace and should not be allowed.

·    British citizens and businesses are being enticed into investing in illegally occupied properties in occupied Cyprus, obviously offered at bargain prices since they are stolen assets.

·   Rizokarpassides who are British citizens, first, second and third generation expect their Government's support in demanding the return of their illegally occupied properties in Cyprus.

·   The British Government is expected to be active in securing human rights for all the legitimate people of Cyprus and  ensuring that the Turkish troops and settlers cease to prop up an illegal regime and cease to occupy a third of the Republic of Cyprus.

·   The British Government should recognise that the Turkish Cypriots are not isolated, many of them work and receive free national health and social security benefits in the Republic of Cyprus;   it is the illegal Turkish settlers and their offspring who are isolated, however, their very existence in occupied Cyprus is against Article 49 of the Fourth Geneva Convention which forbids an occupying power transferring part of its civilian population to occupied territory.

·   The current application by the illegal, unrecognised regime to the British Aviation Authority for direct flights to occupied Cyprus should be rejected outright.

·   The decision of the so called "decisions of the council of ministers" of the illegal regime to promote the establishment of guest-houses in the Karpass region is outrageous.

 Simon Horner's responses, in summary, were:

·   The British Government accepts that there must be a negotiated settlement that is acceptable to all the Cypriot people.

·   The advice on the FCO to British Citizens is very clear; they are advised against buying Greek Cypriot property in north Cyprus.  The FCO is looking to further amend its advice following the recent property law passed in the Republic of Cyprus.

·   The property issue has to be settled as part of a wider comprehensive settlement that is acceptable to all the people of Cyprus.

·   Britain does not want to see a divided Cyprus but fears that if Turkey's EU accession process is halted there will be no incentive for Turkey to make progress on the Cyprus issue.

·   British policy is to lock Turkey into the EU accession process since the British goal is for Turkey to develop into a modern democratic country. 

·   Turkey will need to comply with ECHR decisions if EU accession talks are to progress and this provides the best hope for the achievement of a comprehensive settlement that will be acceptable to all the Cypriot people.

·   An application for direct flights made two years ago was turned down; nothing really has changed since then.

·   Britain has no intention to recognise the illegal regime in occupied Cyprus.

·   The British Government has no control over the media and there is no law to stop advertisements for holidays or properties in occupied Cyprus.

·   Britain needs to continue to talk to all parties, including Turkey and the Turkish Cypriots as part of the process of trying to achieve a comprehensive settlement acceptable to all Cypriots.

 Simon Horner said that he valued the opportunity to meet and hear the views of the delegation. Madeline Knox said she valued meeting the delegation.   They reassured the delegation that Britain genuinely wants a comprehensive solution acceptable to all Cypriots.

______________________________________________________________________________________________

Auctioning Off Former Statesmen and Dime-a-Dozen Generals

The High-Jacking of a Nation

By SIBEL EDMONDS
"The real rulers in Washington are invisible and exercise power from behind the scenes."
---Justice Felix Frankfurter
It used to be the three branches--congress, the executive, and the courts--that we considered the make-up of our nation's federal government. And some would point to the press as a possible fourth branch, due to the virtue of its influence in shaping our policies. Today, more and more people have come to view corporate and foreign lobby firms, with their preponderant clout and enormous power, as the official fourth branch of our nation's government. Not only do I agree with them, I would even take it a step further and give it a higher status it certainly deserves.
Operating invisibly under the radar of media and public scrutiny, lobby groups and foreign agents have become the 'epicenter' of our government, where former statesmen and 'dime a dozen generals' cash in on their connections and peddle their enormous influence to the highest bidders turned clients. These groups' activities shape our nation's policies and determine the direction of the flow of its taxpayer driven wealth, while to them the interests of the majority are considered irrelevant, and the security of the nation is perceived as inconsequential.
In Part1 of this series I used Saudi influence via its lobby and foreign agents by default as a case to illustrate how certain foreign interests, combined with their U.S. agents and benefactors, override the interests and security of the entire nation. This illustrative model case involved three major elements: the purchasing of a few 'dime a dozen generals,' bidding high in the auctioning of 'former statesmen,' and buying one or two ex-congressmen turned lobbyists. In addition, the piece emphasized the importance of the "Military Industrial Complex (MIC)," which became a de facto 'foreign agent' by the universally recognized principle of 'mutual benefit.'
This article will attempt to illustrate the functioning of the above model in the case of another country, the Republic of Turkey, and its set of agents and operators in the U.S. In doing so, I want to emphasize the importance of separating the populace of example nations--Saudi Arabia, Israel, Turkey, Pakistan--from their regimes and select key participating actors. As is the case with our nation, they too suffer the consequences of their regime's self-serving policies and conduct. Not only that, they also have to endure what they consider ' U.S. imposed policies' that further the interests of only a few. Think of it this way, the majority of us in the States do not see the infamous and powerful neocon cabal as the chosen and accepted representatives of our nation's values and objectives. We do not want to be perceived and judged based on the actions of a few at Abu Ghraib or Guantanamo. The same is valid for these nations' citizenry; so let not their corrupt and criminal regimes be the basis of our judgment of them.
Moreover, as we all know, those subject to criticism in these articles have mastered the art of spinning when it comes to the media and propaganda. The Israeli lobby is quick to stamp all factually backed criticism as 'anti-Semitic' and attack it as such. The Turkish lobby, in this regard, as with everything else, follows its Israeli mentors; they label all dissent and criticism as anti-Turkey, or, Kurdish or Armenian propaganda; while the Saudi lobby goes around kicking and screaming 'anti-Muslim propaganda.' I am not known to be 'politically correct' and am often criticized for it. I readily accept that and all responsibilities associated with it. I am not seeking a position as a diplomat, neither am I serving any business, organization, or media channel furthering a particular ideology. This is me, saying it as I see it; no more, no less. By the end of this series it should be obvious, at least for many, that the selection of the nations encompasses varied sides and affiliations. Moreover, the main purpose, and the target of these commentaries, goes to the heart of our own government and its epicenter; lobbyists and the MIC.
 
* * * *
Many Americans, due to the effective propaganda and spin machine of Turkey's agents in the U.S., and relentless efforts by high-level officials and lobbying groups on Turkish networks' payroll, do not know much about Turkey; its position and importance in the areas of terrorism, money laundering, illegal arms sales, industrial and military espionage, and the nuclear black-market. Not many people in the States would name Turkey among those nations that threaten global security, the fight against terrorism, nuclear proliferation, or the war on drugs. For the purpose of this article it is necessary to have at least a rudimentary knowledge of Turkey, its strategic location within global criminal networks, its various networks and entities operating behind seemingly legitimate fronts, and its connection to the military and political machine in the U.S.
For many Americans Turkey is one of the closest allies of the United States; a most important member of NATO; a candidate for EU membership; and the only Middle-Eastern close ally and partner of Israel. Some acknowledge Turkey's highly prized status in the United States due to its location as the artery connecting Europe to Asia, its cross borders with Iran, Iraq and Syria to its East and South, with the Balkan states to its west, and with the Central Asian nations to its north and northeast. Others may recognize the country as one of the top U.S. customers for military technology and weapons.
Interestingly enough, these same qualities and characteristics which make Turkey an important ally and strategic partner for the nation states, make it extremely crucial and attractive to global criminal networks active in transferring illegal arms and nuclear technology to rogue states; in transporting Eastern Narcotics, mainly from Afghanistan through the Central Asian states into Turkey, where it is processed, and then through the Balkan states into Western Europe and the U.S.; and in laundering the proceeds of these illegal operations via its banks and those on the neighboring island of Cyprus.
 
The Real Lords of the Poppy Fields
It is a known fact that there often is a nexus between terrorism and organized crime. Terrorists use Narco-traficking and international crime to support their activities. Frequently, the same criminal gangs involved in narcotics smuggling have links to other criminal activities, such as illegal arms sales, and to terrorist groups. The Taliban's link to the drug trade is irrefutable. In 2001, a report by the U.N. Committee of Experts on Resolution 1333 for sanctions against the Taliban stated that "funds raised from the production and trade of opium and heroin are used by the Taliban to buy arms and war materials and to finance the training of terrorists and support the operation of extremists in neighboring countries and beyond."
Afghanistan supplies almost 90% of the world's heroin, which is the country's main cash crop, contributing over $3 billion a year in illegal revenues to the Afghan economy, which equals 50% of the gross national product. In 2004, according to the U.S. state department, 206,000 hectares were cultivated, a half a million acres, producing 4,000 tons of opium. "It is not only the largest heroin producer in the world, 206,000 hectares is the largest amount of heroin or of any drug that I think has ever been produced by any one country in any given year," says Robert Charles, former assistant secretary of state for International Narcotics and Law Enforcement, overseeing anti-drug operations in Afghanistan.
Heroin trafficking is also the main source of funding for the al-Qaeda terrorists. A Time Magazine article in August 2004 reported that al-Qaeda has established a smuggling network that is peddling Afghan heroin to buyers across the Middle East, Asia, and Europe, and in turn is using the drug revenues to purchase weapons and explosives. The article states: "al-Qaeda and its Taliban allies are increasingly financing operations with opium sales. Anti-drug officials in Afghanistan have no hard figures on how much al-Qaeda and the Taliban are earning from drugs, but conservative estimates run into tens of millions of dollars." Anti-drug officials say the only way to cut off al-Qaeda's pipeline is to attack it at the source: by destroying the poppy farms themselves. This year, Afghanistan's opium harvest is expected to exceed 3,600 tons-enough to produce street heroin worth $36 billion.
Key congressional leaders have been pressing the Pentagon to crack down on the major drug traffickers in Afghanistan upon learning that Al Qaeda is relying more than ever on illicit proceeds from the heroin trade. Congressional investigators who returned from the region in 2004 found that traffickers are providing Osama bin Laden and other terrorists with heroin as funds from Saudi Arabia and other sources dry up. "We now know Al Qaeda's dominant source of funding is the illegal sale of narcotics," said Rep. Kirk-IL, a member of the House Appropriations foreign operations subcommittee, as reported by Washington Times. Rep. Kirk added that Bin Laden's Al Qaeda terror organization is reaping $28 million a year in illicit heroin sales.
It is puzzling to observe that in reporting this major artery of terrorists' funding, the U.S. mainstream media and political machine do not dare to go beyond the poppy fields of Afghanistan and the fairly insignificant low level Afghan warlords overseeing the crops. Think about it; we are talking about nearly $40 billion worth of products in the final stage. Do you believe that those primitive Afghan warlords, clad in shalvars, sporting long ragged beards, and walking with long sticks handle transportation, lab processing, more transportation, distribution, and sophisticated laundering of the proceeds? If yes, then think again. This multi billion-dollar industry requires highly sophisticated networks and people. So, who are the real lords of Afghanistan's poppy fields?
For Al Qaeda's network Turkey is a haven for its sources of funding. Turkish networks, along with Russians', are the main players in these fields; they purchase the opium from Afghanistan and transport it through several Turkic speaking Central Asian states into Turkey, where the raw opium is processed into popular byproducts; then the network transports the final product into Western European and American markets via their partner networks in Albania. The networks' banking arrangements in Turkey, Cyprus and Dubai are used to launder and recycle the proceeds, and various Turkish companies in Turkey and Central Asia are used to make this possible and seem legitimate. The Al Qaeda network also uses Turkey to obtain and transfer arms to its Central Asian bases, including Chechnya.
Since the 1950s Turkey has played a key role in channeling into Europe and the U.S. heroin produced in the "Golden Triangle" comprised of Afghanistan, Pakistan and Iran. These operations are run by mafia groups closely controlled by the MIT (Turkish Intelligence Agency) and the military. According to statistics compiled in 1998, Turkey's heroin trafficking brought in $25 billion in 1995 and $37.5 billion in 1996. That amount makes up nearly a quarter of Turkey's GDP. Only criminal networks working in close cooperation with the police and the army could possibly organize trafficking on such a scale. The Turkish government, MIT and the Turkish military, not only sanctions, but also actively participates in and oversees the narcotics activities and networks.
In July 1998, Le Monde Diplomatique reported that in an explosive document made public at a press conference in Istanbul, the MIT, Turkish Intelligence Agency, accused Turkey's national police, of having "provided police identity cards and diplomatic passports to members of a group which, in the guise of anti-terrorist activities, traveled to Germany, the Netherlands, Belgium, Hungary and Azerbaijan to engage in drug trafficking". MIT provided a list of names of some of the traffickers operating under the protection of the police. The Turkish police returned the compliment and handed over a list of named drug traffickers employed by the MIT!
In January 1997, Tom Sackville, minister of state at the British Home Office, stated that 80% of the heroin seized in Britain came from Turkey, and that his government was concerned by reports that members of the Turkish police, and even of the Turkish government, were involved in drug trafficking.
In an article published in Drug Link Magazine, Adrian Gatton cites the case of Huseyin Baybasin, the famous Turkish heroin kingpin now in jail in Holland. Baybasin explains: "I handled the drugs which came through the channel of the Turkish Consulate in England," and he adds: "I was with the Mafia but I was carrying this out with the same Mafia group in which the rulers of Turkey were part." The article also cites a witness statement given to a UK immigration case involving Baybasin's clan, and states that Huseyin Baybasin had agreed to provide investigators with information about what he knew of the role of Turkish politicians and officials in the heroin trade. The article quotes Mark Galeotti, a former UK intelligence officer and expert on the Turkish mafia, "Since the 1970s, Turkey has accounted for between 75 and 90 per cent of all heroin in the UK. The key traffickers are Turks or criminals who operate along that route using Turkish contacts." In 2001, Chris Harrison, a senior UK Customs officer in Manchester, told veteran crime reporter Martin Short that Customs could not get at the Turkish kingpins because they are "protected" at a high level.
In 1998, the highly official International Narcotics Control Strategy Report (INCSR) of the U.S. State Department, revealed that "about 75% of the heroin seized in Europe is either produced in, or derives from, Turkey", that "4 to 6 tons of heroin arrive from there every month, heading for Western Europe" and that "a number of laboratories for the purification of the opium used in transforming the basic morphine into heroin are located on Turkish soil". The report stresses that Turkey is one of the countries most affected by money-laundering, which takes place particularly via the countries of the ex-Soviet Union, such as Uzbekistan, Azerbaijan, and Turkmenistan, through the medium of casinos, the construction industry, and tourism. INCSR's 2006 report cites Turkey as a major transshipment point and base of operations for international narcotics traffickers and associates trafficking in opium, morphine base, heroin, precursor chemicals and other drugs.
We know that Al Qaeda and Taliban's main source of funding is the illegal sale of narcotics. Based on all the reports, facts, and expert statements, we know that Turkey is a major, if not the top, player in the transportation, processing, and distribution of all the narcotics derived from the Afghan poppies, and as a result, it is the major contributing country to Al Qaeda. Yet, to date, more than five years into our over exhaustive 'war on terror propaganda', have we heard any mentioning of, any tough message to, any sanction against, or any threat that was issued and targeted at Turkey?
We all know of our president's 'selective evilization' of countries that have been 'chosen' to be on our hit list. But how many of us know of our government's 'selective go free cards' that have been issued to those 'ally countries' that directly fund and support the terrorist networks? In fact, our government would rather move heaven and earth, gag 'whistleblowers' with direct knowledge of these facts, classify congressional and other investigative reports, create a media black-out on these 'allies' terrorist supporting activities, than do the right thing; do what it really takes to counter terrorism.
and the WMDs we actually located & have known about
In his 2002 State of the Union address, President Bush declared he would keep "the world's most destructive weapons" from Al Qaeda and its allies by keeping those weapons from evil governments. Later he told a campaign audience in Pennsylvania, "We had to take a hard look at every place where terrorists might get those weapons and one regime stood out: the dictatorship of Saddam Hussein." Well, the Iraqi WMD that never was!
Here is what CIA Director Porter Goss said bluntly before the Senate Intelligence Committee in February 2004, "It may be only a matter of time before Al Qaeda or other groups attempt to use chemical, biological, radiological, or nuclear weapons. We must focus on that." And we know that he knows; has known for the longest time!
Seymour Hersh in his March 2003 article quotes Robert Gallucci, a former United Nations weapons inspector who is now dean of the Georgetown University School of Foreign Service, "Bad as it is with Iran, North Korea, and Libya having nuclear-weapons material, the worst part is that they could transfer it to a non-state group. That's the biggest concern, and the scariest thing about all this. There's nothing more important than stopping terrorist groups from getting nuclear weapons."
Although numerous prestigious reports by agencies and organizations such as IAEA, and news articles in the European media, have clearly established Turkey, and various international networks operating in and out of Turkey, as major players within the global nuclear black-market and illegal arms sales, the relevant agencies and main media in the U.S. have maintained a completely silent and hands off position.
Nuclear black-market related activities depend on Turkey for manufacturing nuclear components, and on its strategic location as a transit point to move goods and technology to nations such as Iran, Pakistan, and others. Not only that, Turkey's status and close relationship with the U.S. enables it to obtain (steal) technology and information from the U.S.
Lying at the crossroads not only between Europe and Asia, but also between the former Soviet Union and the Middle East, Turkey is already a well-established transit zone for illicit goods, including nuclear material and illegal weapons sales. According to a report by Turkish Atomic Energy Authority (TAEA), at least 104 nuclear smuggling incidents had occurred in the past eight years in Turkey. For instance, in September 1999, 5 Kilograms of Uranium enriched to 4.6 percent were confiscated from an international smuggling ring in Turkey, which included four Turkish, one Azerbaijani, and three Kazakhstani citizens. The report cites over one hundred incidents like this, and these are only cases that have been intercepted and reported.
Turkey played a major role in Pakistan and Libya's illicit activities in obtaining nuclear technologies. In June 2004, Stephen Fidler, a reporter for Financial Times reported that in 2003, Turkish centrifuge motors and converters destined for Libya's nuclear weapons program turned up in Tripoli aboard a ship that had sailed from Dubai. One of those detained individuals in this incident, a 'respected and successful' Turkish Businessman, Selim Alguadis, was cited in a public report from the Malaysian inspector-general of police into the Malaysian end of a Pakistani-led clandestine network that supplied Libya, Iran and North Korea with nuclear weapons technologies, designs and expertise. According to the report, "he supplied these materials to Libya." Mr. Alguadis also confessed that he had on several occasions met A Q Khan, the disgraced Pakistani scientist who has admitted transmitting nuclear expertise to the three countries. Selim Alguadis remains a successful businessman in Turkey with companies in several other countries. He was released immediately after being turned over to Turkish authorities. His partner, another well-known and internationally recognized wealthy businessman, Gunes Cire, also actively participated in transferring nuclear technology and parts to Iran, Pakistan and North Korea. Although under investigation by several international communities, Alguadis and his partners continued to roam free in Turkey and conduct their illegitimate operations via their 'legit international business' front companies.
David Albright and Corey Hinderstein of the Institute for Science and International Security (ISIS) identify Turkey's major role in the nuclear black-market. According to their report, workshops in Turkey made the centrifuge motor and frequency converters used to drive the motor and spin the rotor to high speeds. These workshops imported subcomponents from Europe, and they assembled these centrifuge items in Turkey. Under false end-user certificates, these components were shipped from Turkey to Dubai for repackaging and shipment to Libya.
Turkey's illegal arms smuggling activities are not limited to Europe and the Middle East; many of these activities reach U.S. soil. According to a report published by the Institute for the Analysis of Global Security, in April 2004 the Italian police searched a container destined for the port of New York onboard a Turkish ship at the port of Tauro during a routine customs inspection, sparked by discrepancies between the various customs declarations. Inside the container more than 8,000 AK47 assault rifles, 11 submachine guns, and magazines worth over seven million dollars were discovered.
Our tough talking president works very hard to sound convincing when he says 'we have to take a hard look at every place where terrorists might get those weapons;' in fact, he has succeeded in fooling many into believing those words. However, while he was determined to move heaven and earth to get our nation into a war and a quagmire with a country that did NOT possess 'those weapons,' he refused and continues to refuse to look at his own 'allies-packed backyard' where he would find a few that not only do possess 'those weapons,' but also distribute and sell them to the highest bidders no matter what their affiliation.
 
* * * *
Curiously enough, despite these highly publicized reports and acknowledgements of Turkey's role in these activities, Turkey continues to receive billions of dollars of aid and assistance annually from the United States. With its highly placed co-conspirators and connections within the Pentagon, State Department and U.S. Congress, Turkey never has to fear potential sanctions or meaningful scrutiny; just like Saudi Arabia and Pakistan. The criminal Turkish networks continue their global criminal activities right under the nose of their protector, the United States, and neither the catastrophe falling upon the U.S. on September Eleven, nor their direct and indirect role and ties to this terrorist attack, diminish their role and participation in the shady worlds of narcotics, money laundering and illegal arms transfer.
The 'respectable' Turkish companies established and operate bases in Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan and other similar former soviet states. Many of these front companies, disguised under construction and tourism entities, have received millions of dollars in grants from the U.S. government, allocated to them by the U.S. congress, to establish and operate criminal networks throughout the region; among their networking partners are Al Qaeda, the Taliban, and the Albanian Mafia. While the U.S. government painted Islamic charity organizations as the main financial source for Al Qaeda terrorists, it was hard at work trying to cover up the terrorists' main financial source: narcotics and illegal arms sales. Why?
For years and years, information and evidence being collected by the counterintelligence operations of certain U.S. intelligence and law enforcement agencies has been prevented from being transferred to criminal and narcotics divisions, and from being shared with the Drug Enforcement Agency and others with prosecutorial power. Those with direct knowledge have been prevented from making this information available and public by various gag orders and invocation of the State Secrets Privilege. Why?
Is this due to the fact that the existence and survival of many U.S. allies; Turkey, almost all Central Asian nations, and after the September Eleven attack, Afghanistan; greatly depend on cultivating, processing, transporting, and distributing these illegal substances? Is it caused by the fact that a major source of income for those who procure U.S. weapons and technology, our military industrial complex's bread and butter, is being generated from this illegal production and illegal dealings? Or, is it the fear of exposing our own financial institutions, lobbying firms, and certain elected and appointed officials, as beneficiaries?
When it comes to criminal and shady global networks most people envision either Mafiosi like entities who keep to themselves and are separated from society, or, street level gangster-like criminals. Contrary to these expectations, the top tier Turkish criminal networks consist mainly of respectable looking businessmen, some of whom are among the top international businessmen, diplomats, politicians, and scholarly individuals. Their U.S. counterparts are equally respected and recognizable; some of whom are high-level appointed bureaucrats within the State Department and the Pentagon; some are elected officials, and others consist of the combination of the two who have now set up their own companies and lobbying groups.

The American Turkish Council (ATC)
Operating tax-free and under the radar is one of the most powerful "non-profit" associations in the U.S., the American Turkish Council (ATC). Some who are familiar with its operations and players describe it as 'Mini AIPAC;' this description aces it. ATC followed the AIPAC model; with the direct help of AIPAC & JINSA, it created a base out of which to stretch its tentacles, reaching the highest echelons of our government. While the ATC is an association in name and in charter, the reality is that it and other affiliated associations are the U.S. government, lobbyists, foreign agents, and MIC. Investigative journalist, John Stanton, correctly describes the ATC as an extraordinary group of elite and interconnected Republicans, Democrats and corporate and military heavyweights who are spearheading one of the most ambitious strategic gambits in U.S. history.
Included in ATC's management, board of directors, and advisors; in addition to Turkish individuals of 'interest;' is a dizzying array of U.S. individuals. The ATC is led by Ret. General Brent Scowcroft, who serves as Chairman of the Board; George Perlman of Lockheed Martin, the Executive Vice President; other board members include: Former National Security Advisor Sandy Berger, Ret. General Elmer Pendleton, Ret. General Joseph Ralston, Ret. Col. Preston Hughes, Alan Colegrove of Northrop Grumman, Frank Carlucci of Carlyle Group, Christine Vick of Cohen Group, Representative Robert Wexler, Former Rep. Ed WhitfieldBasically many formers; statesmen, 'dime a dozen generals,' and representatives.
On the members--paying clients ­ side; their list includes all the MIC's who's who, such as Lockheed Martin, Boeing, Northrop Grumman; the Washington Lobby scene's who's who; The Cohen Group, The Livingston Group, Washington Group International
Of course, there are also many Turkish companies that are members of the ATC. Most of these companies have branches and operations in Libya, Dubai, Azerbaijan, Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, Kyrgyzstan, and Turkmenistan. Although the official listings of their businesses are cited as 'construction,' 'real estate', 'manufacturing,' and 'tourism'; the main activities of these businesses are known to be related to global illegal arms sales and narcotic processing and trafficking. These companies provide necessary fronts and channels to launder proceeds. Curiously enough, hundreds of millions of dollars have been granted by the United States government, approved by the congress, to these Turkish companies under the guise of various ' U.S. Central Asian development programs;' and 'Iraq & Afghanistan reconstruction programs.'
Stanton notes: 'ATC is joined in the creation of the New EuroAsia by the American Azerbaijan Chamber of Commerce (AACC). AACC's Honorary Council of Advisors just happens to have General Scowcroft and the following persons of significance: Henry Kissinger and James Baker III. Former Council members include Dick Cheney and Richard Armitage, and Board of Trustee members include media-overkill subject Richard Perle of AEI, and Senator Sam Brownback of Kansas.'
 
The MIC Factor
In part 1 we discussed the MIC as 'agents by default;' marriages and loyalties based on 'mutual benefit;' our previous example was Saudi Arabia, top customer of U.S. weaponry. Well, Turkey only trails the Saudis slightly in that category; between 1992 and 1996, Turkey was the second largest importer of weaponry, spending more than $7 billion in four years. A report by the World Policy Institute shows that Turkey is the third largest recipient of U.S. military aid, behind Israel and Egypt. Between 1994 and 2003, Turkey took delivery of more than $6.8 billion in U.S. weaponry and services.
In fiscal year 1989, U.S. aid to Turkey was $563,500,000. According to a Multi National Monitor Report, in 1991, Turkey received more than $800 million in U.S. aid, "an exceptional return" on its $3.8 million investment in Washington lobbyists. At the time, International Advisors, INC. (Douglas Feith & Richard Perle lobbying firm as registered agents for Turkey) was paid more than $1 million for representing Turkey in the U.S. for the purpose of securing these types of deals. In 2003, Turkey received a $1 billion aid package. During this period their registered and known lobbyists were the Livingston Group, headed by the former Speaker of the House Bob Livingston, and Solarz Associates, headed by a formerly powerful Representative, Stephen Solarz. Turkey, from 2000 to 2004, for only four years, paid Livingston $9 million for his lobbying services. What did the Republic of Turkey get for its $2 million per year investment in Ex-Congressman Livingston's services?
A Joint Report by the Federation of American Scientists and the World Policy Institute found that the vast majority of U.S. arms transfers to Turkey were subsidized by U.S. taxpayers. In many cases, these taxpayer funds are supporting military production and employment in Turkey, not in the United States. Of the $10.5 billion in U.S. weaponry delivered to Turkey since 1984, $8 billion in all has been directly or indirectly financed by grants and subsidized loans provided by the U.S. government. Many of the largest deals--such as Lockheed Martin's sale of 240 F-16s to the Turkish air force and the FMC Corporation's provision of 1,698 armored vehicles to the Turkish army--involve co-production and offset provisions which steer investments, jobs, and production to Turkey as a condition of the sale. For example, Turkey's F-16 assembly plant in Ankara--a joint venture of Lockheed Martin and Turkish Aerospace Industries (TAI)--employs 2,000 production workers, almost entirely paid for with U.S. tax dollars.
Let's recap the above data: Not only does our government, actually, our taxpayers, subsidize $8 billion of Turkey's $10 billion weapons purchases; the production of this weaponry and the associated employment occurs not in the U.S., but overseas, in Turkey. We, the taxpayers, are subsidizing these purchases; our nation readily transfers its technology to a country that ranks high in global narcotics, terrorist and WMD related activities; while a select few MIC related firms such as Lockheed and the pimping middlemen, the lobbyists, get fatter and richer.
 
One Stop Shop: The Cohen Group
Like many other former statesmen, William Cohen, former Secretary of Defense, dived into the business of lobbying and consulting, and created his own Washington firm, The Cohen Group, which works for some of the largest companies in the defense industry, such as Lockheed Martin, and serves numerous foreign players. The Cohen Group is one of the primary and most active members of the American Turkish Council (ATC). Cohen's client, Lockheed Martin, happens to be on the board of ATC, in addition to being listed as ATC's top paying client.
The group claims on its Website that its principals have "a century and a half of combined experience in the Congress, the Defense Department, the State Department, the White House, and state and local governments" and that they "have developed extensive expertise and relationships with key international political, economic, and business leaders and acquired invaluable experiences with the individuals and institutions that affect our clients' success abroad." Abroad indeed. With a few 'dime a dozen generals' and former statesmen, the firm owes its phenomenal speedy success to interests 'abroad' and of course, the MIC! Let's look, with great amazement, I hope, at how this ingenious lobby venture serves as foreign agent for several influences without having to register as such; with complete immunity against any scrutiny.
According to Intelligence Online, in its March 27, 2006 issue, Cohen accompanied Bush on his trip to India and Pakistan in March 2006. The Cohen Group is very active in India; Joseph Ralston, Cohen's Vice Chairman, led two delegations of U.S. Defense Chiefs to India the previous year. The trips were organized in conjunction with the U.S. India Business Council; among the participants were Lockheed Martin, Northrop Grumman, and Boeing.
On June 9, 2006, Intelligence Online reports 'already operating in India, the Cohen Group headed by William Cohen, has just opened an office in Beijing... Since 2003 the Cohen Group has equally been employing Christine Vick. She is a former Vice President of Kissinger Associates; the consultancy founded by former Secretary of State Henry Kissinger, and had been in charge of the firm's Chinese business.'
Prior to the October 2005 release of Paul Volcker's report on violations of the United Nations' Iraq oil-for-food program, the Australian wheat exporter AWB Limited hired Cohen's firm. AWB paid approximately $A300 million in trucking fees on its wheat contracts to a Jordanian company, Alia, which owns no trucks! The funds were funnelled to Saddam's regime. AWB hired Cohen Group as part of its 'strategy, ' code-named 'Project Rose', to deal with the UN inquiry headed by Paul Volcker and corruption allegations made against it by U.S. wheat farmers and 'hostile US politicians.' Cohen Group is not a law firm; what kind of services and representation is it providing for this criminal case?
So who are the key players at Cohen's lobby firm, giving it its value? Well of course, a handful of powerful formers; in addition to Cohen as the top principal we have former Undersecretary of State Mark Grossman, and two formerly high-level 'dime a dozen generals:' General Joseph Ralston and General Paul Kern; let's briefly look at them; shall we?
Ret. General Paul Kern
Cohen Group senior counselor is retired general Paul J. Kern, a former head of the Army Materiel Command, who recently served on a panel convened by the Defense Department to recommend improvements in how it acquires weapons systems; of course, a topic of great interest to Cohen clients.
Pentagon's Defense Acquisition Performance Assessment Panel , DAPAP, was created to recommend changes in the awarding of military contracts. Over half of this panel is executives of large defense corporations. Among the Committee's six members are Frank Cappuccio, VP of Lockheed Martin, and retired General Kern, who is the Senior Counselor of the Cohen Group!
When the Pentagon is informed of wasteful practices, it commonly ignores them. Congressman Walter Jones, (R-N.C.) is quoted as understating, "We've got an agency that is not doing its job of being a watchdog for the taxpayers." Retired Army Reserve officer Paul Fellencer Sr. complained to the Pentagon's fraud hot line last year about $200-million worth of outrageous overpayments for ordinary supplies. Pentagon investigators never bothered to call him and dismissed his tip as "unsubstantiated," the news service said.
One wonders how many American citizens are aware of the fact that a 'dime a dozen general' such as Kern, who happens to be a Senior Counsel of a lobby firm with foreign interests and MIC representation, who happens to sit on the board of Lockheed Martin, gets to sit on a panel that monitors and advises on awarding military contracts to the private MIC companies by the Pentagon. Would it take an absolute genius to figure out that this is 'putting a fox in charge of the hen house'? If not, then how could this get past the decision makers at the Pentagon? How come our lawmakers, those in charge of ensuring the checks and balances in our government, those we consider our representatives, sit there either unaware or unbothered by this red flag visible from a hundred miles away? What happened to 'investigative journalists with good noses;' were they all inflicted by congested sinuses at the same time?
Fmr. Gen. Joseph Ralston
General Joseph Ralston, one of Cohen Group's Vice Chairmen, is on the board of Lockheed Martin, which paid the Cohen Group $550,000 in 2005, according to a Lockheed filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission. Ralston is also a member of the 2006 Advisory Board of the American Turkish Council (ATC), and one of Turkey's top advocates. If you think this 'dime a dozen general' ended one career and removed himself from the U.S. government by becoming 'the foreign agent man,' think again after reading the following.
On August 28, 2006, the U.S. State Department appointed the former U.S. Air Force General, current Vice Chairman of the Cohen Group, board member of American Turkish Council, registered lobbyist for Lockheed Martin, Joseph Ralston, as a "Special Envoy" for countering the Kurdistan Worker's Party (PKK)! Lo and behold, Ralston's appointment came as Turkey was finalizing the purchase of 30 new Lockheed Martin F-16 aircraft valued at $3 billion, and as Turkey was due to make its decision on the $10 billion purchase of the new Lockheed Martin F-35 JSF aircraft. Coincidentally, the U.S. Congress approved the sale of the F-16s to Turkey in October 2006, shortly after Ralston's return from Turkey.
While the implications of Ralston's appointment caused a major stir within the Kurdish community and organizations, mainly pointing to Ralston's position with the Turkish lobby in the U.S. (he is on the board of ATC), and within Turkey's own communities, pointing to Ralston's position with Lockheed Martin (he is on the board of Lockheed Martin), our own media, watchdog organizations, and congress let this gargantuan conflict of interest pass under the radar.
Our government sent this man, Ralston, as a special envoy to help resolve the highly critical Northern Iraq situation with possible dire consequences in the near future. Considering Ralston's livelihood and his loyalties, as a member of the board of the directors of Lockheed Martin, as the vice chairman of a lobbying firm with foreign interests, as an advisor and board member for the most powerful Turkish Lobby group, ATC, who did this man represent while in Turkey as the special envoy? What interests did he really represent; Iraq's situation, Lockheed's livelihood, which depends on further conflicts and bloodshed; the corrupt and criminal government of Turkey and its representation via ATC; or, the furthering of the Cohen Group's future pimping opportunities?
Why in the world did no one within the U.S. mainstream media give even the slightest coverage of this conflict of interest? Why did no one, Democrat or Republican, in our congress make a peep? Why haven't we heard anyone asking Ralston the most important question, in dire need of an answer: 'Who's your daddy Ralston; boy?' Ralston's position is no different than what is defined in the Oxford English Dictionary as: "A person conceived and born out of wedlock." With the possibility of any one of four daddies, and without the benefit of a DNA test, how do we go about determining Ralston's real daddy?
Fmr. Undersecretary Marc Grossman
The second Vice Chairman of Cohen's firm is Marc Grossman, who was the U.S. Undersecretary for Political Affairs in the State Department from 2001 until 2005. From November 1994 to June 1997, he served as U.S. Ambassador to Turkey. In January 2005 Grossman resigned from his position and joined the Cohen Group. In late December 2005, Grossman joined Ihlas Holding, a large and alleged shady Turkish company which is also active in several Central Asian countries. Grossman is reported to receive $100,000 per month for his advisory position with Ihlas.' Most and foremost, Grossman is known for his extraordinarily cozy relationship with Turkey and Israel; followed by Pakistan.
Here is Grossman as the key speaker at an ATC conference in March 2002; while Undersecretary of State; and here it is followed by Grossman's visit to Turkey in December 2002, to approve the $3 billion U.S. aid to Turkey for the Iraq Cooperation deal. There he goes again, Grossman back to Turkey in December 2003 re: approval of Turkey's eligibility to participate in tenders for Iraq's reconstruction! Here is Grossman as the key speaker at an ATC Conference held at the Omni Shoreham Hotel in December 2004, while Undersecretary. Here is Grossman as the guest of honor and key speaker at the American Turkish Society dinner in New York in February 2005, while Undersecretary. Here he is again, at the lavish Turkish Ottoman Dinner Gala in November 2005. Here is Grossman at the award dinner gala by the Turkish lobby group, the Assembly of American Turkish Association (ATAA), in Chicago, receiving his award in November 2005. Here is Grossman as the key speaker at the ATC annual conference in March 2006, and later, in June 2006, at the MERIA Conference to discuss Turkey's importance to the U.S. & Israel. This list can go on for pages and pages; but I believe you all get it; right?
Here is a comment by Wolfowitz during his visit to Turkey:"I'm delighted to be back in Turkey and so is my colleague Marc Grossman, who feels like Turkey is a second home." Second home indeed, Mr. Grossman!
Please do not make the grave and naive mistake of assuming that Grossman found and obtained his highly lucrative and questionable positions after his resignation in January 2005. Within two months after his confident resignation, this boy got the vice chairmanship of the Cohen Group. Only six months later, Grossman ended up securing a 'special advisory' position for a foreign company that reported his monthly fee at $100,000 a month. The industrious Grossman seems to be juggling so many balls simultaneously: numerous foreign sponsored dinner speeches, the demanding pimping activities of Cohen's firm, the very 'special advising' of a shady foreign company
We all have a pretty good idea how long and how much work it takes to secure that level of income and those positions. Did Grossman beat the odds and get lucky as soon as he got out of the State Department? Did he hit the jackpot? Or, did he diligently and industriously work at it, while in his position as the ambassador to Turkey and as Deputy Secretary of State? Did he sell his soul while under his oath of office? Did he sell our government's soul? Did he sell our nation and its interests? If so; for what and how much?
* * * *
Long gone are the days when generals were content to retire and go back home where they held their heads high as honorable patriots and heroes who had served their nation; where they marched in their towns' parades as proud distinguished men and women who had fulfilled their duty to the people. Today, as we clearly see, they perceive themselves and their authority as a commodity; they go about marketing their worth (nationally and internationally; foreign and domestic) long before they leave their positions as public servants.
The same goes for many of our statesmen. While in office, Grossman and others like him appear to have one objective in mind and in action: to make sure that their future employer who is waiting for them on the other side of the revolving door will receive special and lucrative arrangements so that they can be compensated handsomely later.
In Part1, we briefly described the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA), established to insure that the American public and its lawmakers know the source of propaganda intended to sway public opinion, policy, and laws; and the Lobbying Disclosure Act (LDA) of 1995, which was passed to make the regulation and disclosure of lobbying the federal government more effective. The article emphasized that both of these cosmetic laws are filled with exemptions and loopholes that allow minimization of, and in some cases complete escape from, warranted scrutiny, and have serious loopholes and limitations.
The Cohen Group is an excellent case, illustrating the futility of FARA, since the firm does not have to be registered. They can claim that Turkey is not their 'direct' client; they can argue that they are not getting paid 'directly' by the government of Turkey or any other foreign entity or government. They certainly can; no matter that Grossman receives hundreds of thousands of dollars from a dubious Turkish company. Does Cohen discount Grossman's Vice Chairmanship salary accordingly? No matter that half a million dollars per year from their client Lockheed Martin is mainly for services provided to Turkey, and having the group's second chairman serve on Lockheed's board is another way to get around all restrictions. The incestuous relationship twists and turns: The Cohen Group on the board of ATC, The Cohen Group a paying member client of ATC, The Cohen Group as Lockheed's lobbyist, Cohen's men on the board of Lockheed, Lockheed on the board of ATC, Lockheed also a paying client of ATCHow is your head; spinning yet?
We are proud of the large turnout at the ballot box for the midterm elections a few weeks ago; a sign of participatory citizenship. Perhaps we'll be repeating this phenomenon, if not increasing it, for the presidential elections in two years; another means to demonstrate our 'democratic government process in action' for badly needed change. But who really runs our country? Who really shapes our public policies and determines the flow of our hard-earned tax money entrusted to our government? If you had the patience to go through this article, which sheds light on only a fragment of what really takes place behind our backs, within the halls of our government, in all three branches, you would start questioning your significance as a voter and taxpayer, and you would begin wondering whether you are governed by who you think you are.
The foreign influence, the lobbyists, the current highly positioned civil servants who are determined future 'wanna be' lobbyists, and the fat cats of the Military Industrial Complex, operate successfully under the radar, with unlimited reach and power, with no scrutiny, while selling your interests, benefiting from your tax money, and serving the highest bidders regardless of what or who they may be. This deep state seems to operate at all levels of our government; from the President's office to Congress, from the military quarters to the civil servants' offices. Let's let Marcus Cicero's timeless warning from over two thousand years ago put the finishing touch on this article:
"A nation can survive its fools, and even the ambitious. But it cannot survive treason from within. An enemy at the gates is less formidable, for he is known and carries his banner openly. But the traitor moves amongst those within the gate freely, his sly whispers rustling through all the alleys, heard in the very halls of government itself. For the traitor appears not a traitor; he speaks in accents familiar to his victims, and he wears their face and their arguments, he appeals to the baseness that lies deep in the hearts of all men. He rots the soul of a nation, he works secretly and unknown in the night to undermine the pillars of the city, he infects the body politic so that it can no longer resist. A murder[er] is less to fear."
Sibel Edmonds is the founder and director of National Security Whistleblowers Coalition ( NSWBC). Ms. Edmonds worked as a language specialist for the FBI. During her work with the bureau, she discovered and reported serious acts of security breaches, cover-ups, and intentional blocking of intelligence that had national security implications. After she reported these acts to FBI management, she was retaliated against by the FBI and ultimately fired in March 2002. Since that time, court proceedings on her case have been blocked by the assertion of "State Secret Privilege"; the Congress of the United States has been gagged and prevented from any discussion of her case through retroactive re-classification by the Department of Justice. Ms. Edmonds is fluent in Turkish, Farsi and Azerbaijani; and has a MA in Public Policy and International Commerce from George Mason University, and a BA in Criminal Justice and Psychology from George Washington University. PEN American Center awarded Ms. Edmonds the 2006 PEN/Newman's Own First Amendment Award. She can be reached at: sedmonds@nswbc.org
 
� Copyright 2006, National Security Whistleblowers Coalition. Information in this release may be freely distributed and published provided that all such distributions make appropriate attribution to the National Security Whistleblowers Coalition.
 

 

 

ASSOCIATION OF RIZOKARPASSO IN BRITAIN

DINNER & DANCE

 

The Association of Rizokarpasso in Britain held their annual Dinner & Dance at the Penridge Banqueting Suite, which was filled with hundreds of first, second, and third generation compatriots from Rizokarpasso and their friends. Penridge Director, John Pitsielis, whose mother is from Rizokarpasso, was delighted that, as usual, the Penridge was chosen as the venue for this event.   The well known Venus Orchestra  provided excellent entertainment which kept the dance floor full.   Speeches to the assembled diners were short and delivered by the Very Reverend Archimandrite Damianos Constantinou; Cyprus High Commission Director of the Cyprus Trade Centre, Ioannis Shiekkeris; Member of Parliament for Finchley & Golders Green, Rudi Vis; Member of Parliament for Chipping Barnet, Theresa Villiers; and Chairman of the Greater London Authority, Cllr Brian Coleman.

 

The guests were very impressed with the large gathering of several generations of Cypriots and the obvious fact that there were many British born Rizokarpassides present, enjoying themselves in the company of family and friends, proud of their roots and enthusiastic in their applause when Maria Karaolis, the President of the Association, in her speech said: "This evening our thoughts are of Rizokarpasso, with our enclaved friends, relatives and compatriots, the upholders of human rights, who have sacrificed the last 32years guarding our rights to our properties.    We, as all the other refugees, will not allow anyone to give title or ownership of our land to anybody else".   

 

The evening included the raffle prizes draw with top prizes being a return ticket to Cyprus, kindly donated by Cyprus Airways and a return ticket to Athens, kindly donated by Olympic Airways.   The winning numbers were 1218, 0982, 1057, 1788, 0220, 0790, 0295, 0987, 0330











________________________________________________________________________________________________

The 67th General Meeting of the Association of Rizokarpasso in Britain

The 67th General Meeting of the Association of Rizokarpasso in Britain, held at the Cypriot Community Centre on Sunday 15th October, was well attended and gave members the opportunity to discuss a number of issues and support future actions including the sending of a £50 Christmas present to each of the 55 enclaved school children in Rizokarpasso.  President of the Association, Mrs Maria Karaolis, reported on the recent political, social and philanthropic activities of the Association and the Association Treasurer, Mr Yiannis Chronias, reported on the Association finances and accounts.  After the formal meeting members remained to socialise over "souvlakia" and will meet again at the Association Dinner and Dance on Saturdary 18th November at the Penridge Banquesting Suite,Bowes Road, N11 where they will also be entertained by the well known Venus orchestra.  The members voted the following to be sent to world leaders, all EU member governments and the UN Security Council members.

RESOLUTION

 Adopted on the 15th October 2006 at the

67th General Meeting of the members of The Association of Rizokarpasso in Britain

The members of our Association were either born in Rizokarpasso or their parents or grandparents were born in Rizokarpasso.   Most of our members are the legal owners of homes and properties in Rizokarpasso and since the 1974 Turkish invasion of Cyprus have been denied the use and enjoyment of their properties.  

We believe that the continued occupation of Cyprus by settlers from Turkey is denying the people of   Cyprus and our members their human rights, fundamental freedoms and social justice and the very principles at the heart of democracy.  Furthermore, Turkey is in flagrant violation of the relevant United Nations Security Council Resolutions including General Assembly resolution 3212 (1974).

We believe that the 32 year sacrifice of the enclaved in Rizokarpasso, who have been suffering under Turkish occupation, should not be ignored and we urge you to assist in improving the tragic conditions under which they live.

We welcome the European Parliament resolution calling on Turkey to honour its commitments to the EU by allowing ships and planes from Cyprus to enter Turkish ports and airports. We also welcome the view that recognition of all member states is a necessary component of the accession process for Turkey.

We believe that the final solution to the Cyprus problem, must be based on international law, international legality, the relevant UN and Security Council resolutions and the acquis communautaire, a solution which will benefit the people of Cyprus and bring peace, stability and growth in the region.

We condemn the usurping and exploitation of properties in occupied north Cyprus, and the recent announcement by the illegal regime of its intention to commercially exploit the Karpass peninsular

Our Association calls upon the British Government to be more positive and proactive and to fulfil its obligations as a Guarantor Power for the independence, sovereignty and territorial integrity of the Republic of Cyprus.

Our Association believes that the interests of democracy and international law require the following:

a)      The removal of all Turkish troops from Cyprus.

b)      The repatriation to Turkey of the over 120,000 illegal settlers in Cyprus.

c)      The restoration of the human rights and fundamental freedoms of all Cypriots.

d)      The reunification of the island and people of Cyprus

e)      The return of all the refugees to their homes and properties in safety.

f)       The return of all properties to their lawful owners.

g)      The end of the suffering of the enclaved.

h)      The full and effective investigation of the fate of all the missing persons.

 

Mrs Mary Helen Karaolis   BEd (Hons)  MA  NPQH
President of the Association of Rizokarpasso in Britain on behalf of the Committee & Members

 

_______________________________________________________________

The more letters that The Independent receives the better so could all Members of our Association please send individual letters complaining about the holidays advertised in occupied northern Cyprus.
24th September 2006

The Editor                                                                                                        
The Independent Newspaper

191 Marsh Wall
London E14 9RS

Dear Sir
The members of our Association are shocked, saddened, angry and offended at the adverts for holidays in occupied northern Cyprus, (which is controlled by an illegal regime, backed by an large occupying Turkish army), which you published in The Independent.   We consider that such promotion is aiding and abetting theft and exploitation of stolen property and goes against all moral standards and human rights.   It is not befitting  our civilized, mature, democracy where we expect that thieves will be punished, not assisted to sell their illegal gains by such a prestigious newspaper as The Independent!

Many members of our Association have not only been denied access and use of their properties in northern, occupied Cyprus for the last 32 years but had also invested their life savings and borrowed in England in order to invest in Cyprus.   The 1974 invasion, occupation and colonization of northern Cyprus by Turkey left many of our members heavily in debt in England and at risk of losing their home here as well. On page 129 of the book "Stigma Number One" by Stephen George, one of our members, is the paragraph:

"With some savings and a loan, I made the transformation from an unknown beach to a well-known tourists' paradise.   In 1974 with the Turkish invasion, I lost the lot.  My ready-made business was being run by an opportunistic invader and I, the creator, have to work hard to repay the loan."

Our members feel a sense of outrage at the unacceptable promotion of exploitation of their properties;  such adverts encourage tourists to stay in properties which are occupied illegally. We will continue to strive for a just and viable solution to the Cyprus problem; a solution which will reunite the island and bring peace and prosperity to all the legal people of Cyprus and the return of the refugees to their homes and properties without the existence of Turkish troops or settlers.   Please restore your standing as an ethically and morally correct newspaper; retrospectively retract the advert and ensure that safeguards are put into place to avoid a recurrence of such materials being published.

Yours truly
Mrs Mary Helen Karaolis B Ed (Hons)  MA  NPQH
President of the Association of Rizokarpasso in Britain

 

__________________________________________________________________________________
Rt. Hon. Margaret Beckett MP                                                                                              

Secretary of State for Foreign & Commonwealth Affairs

Foreign & Commonwealth Office

King Charles Street

London SW1A 2AH

 

His Excellency Robert Holmes Tuttle                                                                                   

US Ambassador to the Court of St James's

24 Grosvenor Square

London W1A 1AE

 

28th July 2006

 


Cyprus is, once again, saving Americans, British and other foreign nationals seeking to flee the traumatic events taking place in Lebanon. As in 1983, when Cyprus opened its heart and took in wounded and dying U.S. Marines bombed in their Beirut barracks.


`Remarkable cooperation' and `absolutely phenomenal' said Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and UN spokesman Brian Kelly about the actions of Cyprus – a nation of only 760,000 – to help evacuate 25,000 American citizens and others from Lebanon. Cypriots have been working around-the-clock to feed, house and transport these refugees. Furthermore, Cyprus plans to serve as a crucial staging point for a massive humanitarian effort in Lebanon;   the Cypriots know only too well the trauma experienced by the fleeing refugees and foreign nationals.

When Cyprus needs America and Britain in the settlement talks, will we be there for them? America is the most powerful country on the planet, will this year's American-backed settlement proposal be predicated on the supposition that Turkey occupies Cyprus because Turkish-Cypriots need protection when in fact 10 million crossings of the Green Line dividing Cyprus have occurred, without incident? Or will an American-backed settlement be predicated on the peace between Turkish-Cypriots and Greek-Cypriots that has prevailed for 96% of their 400-year-history;   a peace that outside interests for their own geopolitical strategies sought to break in the early 1960's as disclosed by BBC Radio 4 programme "UK's murky role in Cyprus crisis" (23 rd January 2006).

This time, will America and Britain support the Turkish demands if again they reject all settlement plans unless they: (1) void property rights of certain ethnicities; (2) require official foreign involvement in Cyprus' governance and military; and (3) impose less than one-man-one-vote for certain ethnicities and more than one-man-one-vote for other ethnicities?  Or, will America and Britain support democratic principles and promote the withdrawal of Turkish troops and settlers from the occupied north of the island and the return of all the refugees to their homes and properties thereby recognising the basic human right of property owners and putting a halt onTurkey's expansionist policy and strategy to change the demographic character of Cyprus?

The members of our Association hope that an ethical foreign policy based on democratic priciples and human rights will be followed by America and Britain in future Cyprus settlement plans.

 

Yours sincerely

 

 

Mrs Mary Helen Karaolis  BEd(Hons)   MA  NPQH

President of the Association of Rizokarpasso in Britain

 

_____________________________________________

TURKISH TROOPS AND SETTLERS OUT OF CYPRUS

Members of the Association of Rizokarpasso in Britain joined the wider Greek Cypriot community in Britain on Sunday 16th July 2006 in Trafalgar Square to protest against the invasion and occupation of our island by Turkey and Turkey's continued denial of freedom and human rights for the Greek Cypriots.  The Rally was organised by the National Federation of Cypriots in the UK with the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Cyprus as the main speaker.  Other dignitaries included the Mayors of Morphou and Famagusta, a number of British Members of Parliament, Members of the European Parliament and the Chairman of the Greater London Assembly.  The demand from all was clear:  TURKISH TROOPS AND SETTLERS OUT OF CYPRUS - 32 YEARS OF SUFFERING  AND DENIAL OF HUMAN RIGHTS IS UNACCEPTABLE.


Mery karaolis President of the Association of Rizokarpasso in Britain ahd Anna Manitara with her daughters Maria and Zoe


Michalis and Nicos with the banner


General view - Trafalgar Square

 

 

Greek

New Hellenic Radio stations  

Cyprus  TV Channels
Only for I-choice CYTA customers
ΡΙΚ 1
ΡΙΚ 2
Sigma
MEGA
ANTENA
MiVision


European Union


Republic of Cyprus

"Rizokarpason©"
Contact us: rizo@rizokarpason.com
Visit from: 11/10/1999